1. Home
  2. Reviews
  3. SmallRig 240W

Review · PD 3.1 desk unit · 240W class

SmallRig 240W 4-Port: budget, not a single-port number.

A four-port PD 3.1 desk charger rated 240W in total. The number is genuine and widely misread: no laptop on sale draws 240W from one port. You are buying a budget large enough that no port has to lose.

The specification, as published

AttributeWhat the spec commits to
Rated output240W total, shared across all ports
Port count4 — commonly three USB-C plus one USB-A
ProtocolUSB-C PD 3.1 / EPR, with a 140W-class top port over the 28V rail
Form factorDesktop brick with a detachable AC cord — this does not plug directly into a wall socket
Cable requirementA 240W EPR-rated 5A e-marked cable for anything above 100W
Notable featureEnough headroom to run a large laptop at full speed with three other devices attached

Verify the per-port maximums on the listing you buy: "240W" is a total, and what varies between four-port units is how much any single port takes. 140W on the top port is the figure that matters for a large laptop. SmallRig comes from the camera and video world, which is why its power products are shaped for a cart rather than a pocket (SmallRig brand page).

What it is genuinely good at

Removing the split problem entirely. Below this tier, a second device always costs the first its contract. With 240W, a 140W laptop plus a 65W second laptop plus two phones still fits. That is the whole product.

Charging camera and video gear over USB-C. Camera batteries, monitors, LED panels and gimbals increasingly charge over USB-C PD, and a video kit is where four simultaneous high-draw devices is normal rather than theoretical.

Where it falls short, and who should skip it

Nothing you own draws 240W from one port. 240W is 48V × 5A under PD 3.1, and consumer devices requesting the 48V rail are essentially nonexistent — the highest common ask is a 16″ MacBook Pro at 140W over 28V. Read 240W as total budget; a listing implying a single 240W device port is marketing.

It is a desk object with a cord. No folding prongs, two pieces to pack. For travel the right category is a 65W travel unit.

Massive overbuy for most households. If your largest device is a 14″ MacBook Pro or an ultrabook, a 100W four-port does the job for far less money and volume.

Device fit: what it actually serves at full speed

ScenarioWorks?Detail
MacBook Pro 16″ aloneYes140W-class port over the 28V rail, with a 240W cable
MacBook Pro 16″ + phone + tablet + earbudsYesThe case that breaks a 140W unit
Camera batteries, monitors, gimbals over USB-C PDYesFour-way simultaneous draw is what the budget buys
A single 240W deviceNot applicableNo mainstream consumer device requests the 48V rail
Galaxy S25 Ultra at 45WWith a published PPS rangePD 3.1 support does not imply PPS — check the listing

This unit, and the honest alternatives

  • 240W

    SmallRig 240W 4-Port PD

    The unit under review: 240W of shared PD 3.1 budget across four ports, 140W-class top port.

    Output
    240W total
    Ports
    3× C, 1× A
    Standard
    PD 3.1 / EPR
    Body
    Corded desktop
    Check price on Amazon
  • Alt

    HyperJuice 245W GaN desktop

    The closest rival: four ports, a 140W PD 3.1 port, same desk-brick philosophy.

    Output
    245W total
    Ports
    4
    Standard
    PD 3.1
    Best for
    Desk consolidation
    Check price on Amazon
  • 140W

    UGREEN Nexode 140W

    The sane downgrade: a real 28V rail at half the budget, in a smaller, cheaper brick.

    Output
    140W total
    Standard
    PD 3.1
    Ports
    2-3
    Best for
    One big laptop
    Check price on Amazon
Count your simultaneous draw before buying this tier. Add the peak wattage of everything plugged in at once, then add 20%: a 16″ MacBook Pro (140W), an iPhone (20W) and an iPad (30W) is 190W plus headroom — genuinely 240W class.

Related reading

Up: all adapter reviews. Class: 240W power adapters. Brand: SmallRig chargers. Siblings: HyperJuice 245W, Anker Prime 140W, UGREEN Nexode 140W. Background: 240W USB-C and EPR.

FAQ

Is there any device that actually uses 240W over USB-C?

Not in mainstream consumer hardware. 240W is 48V at 5A under PD 3.1, and the highest common request is 140W over 28V from a 16-inch MacBook Pro.

Do I need a 240W cable for every port?

Only for the port feeding a device above 100W. Phones, tablets and 65W laptops are fine on ordinary cables, though 100W on one port still needs a 5A e-marked cable.

Why would a camera accessory brand make a charger?

Because video kits are one of the few consumer scenarios with several high-draw USB-C devices at once: camera bodies, monitors, LED panels and gimbals all charge over Power Delivery now.